Bambha & Nandan is a law firm based in Delhi, a firm constituted in 2014 by two partners, Mr. Siddharth Bambha & Mr. Shyam D Nandan.
The firm has its corporate office at 28/44, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi and a litigation office at B-20, GroundFloor, Nizamuddin (East), New Delhi. Today the firms apart from the above named partners, has 3 Senior Associates, 4 Associates apart from 5 paralegal. The firm does broad spectrum of work primarily involving civil and commercial laws in all courts including the District Courts, the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court. The firm’s tribunals work includes the Debt Recovery Tribunal ( DRT), Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal ( DRAT), Competition Commission of India (CCI), Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) and National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) as well as the...
MUMBAI: Describing the suspension of India News ratings by BARC(Broadcast Audience Research Council India) as ‘arbitrary and illegal’ by an order dated 6 December, 2016, the Bombay High Court stayed the suspension of BARC ratings of India News. The court has stated that the suspension and subsequent communication to all the subscribers has been prima-facie seen as a reputation maligning action, a press release from India News stated.
Read More
The Delhi High Court has held that the imposition of IGST on the import of oxygen concentrators by individuals for personal use is unconstitutional.The High Court had reserved order in the a 85 year old's plea challenging the levy of IGST on the import of oxygen generators as gift for personal use to India.The petitioner challenged a notification dated 01.05.2021 issued by the Ministry of...
Read More
Court seeks Centre’s stand, posts next hearing to February 3
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday asked the Union Government to respond to a fresh application seeking permission to live-stream the court proceedings on a bunch of petitions for recognising same-sex marriages.
A Bench of Chief Justice D.N. Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh, which is currently seized of five separate petitions of several same-sex couples, posted the hearing in the fresh plea to February 3 next year.
The petitioner was 85 years old and had approached the Court against the imposition of IGST on the import of the oxygen concentrator which had been gifted to him by his nephew. The petitioner asserted that the imposition of tax was discriminatory, unfair, and unreasonable and that it impinges upon his right to life and health. The clearance of the oxygen concentrator from the customs barrier required payment of IGST at the rate of 12%. It is relevant to note that before 01-05-2021, an individual importer would have had to pay IGST at the rate of 28% qua oxygen concentrator gifted to him for personal use.
Read More
THE Delhi High Court Thursday appointed senior advocate Arvind Datar as amicus curiae to assist the court in a plea seeking to exempt the imposition of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on individuals importing oxygen concentrators for personal use, including on those who have been gifted the same for personal use.
Read More@ 2014 B&N
